MaxG

It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.
Anonymous

Suzuki Burgman 400 AN K7

Summary: My first impressions about the Suzuki Burgman 400 K7 (model 2007), which I bought in August 2006 to replace the Honda Foresight FES250 (I had for seven years), after its engine died unexpectedly

Suzuki Burgman 400

Suzuki Burgman 400

Since Aug 10th, 2006 I am a proud owner of a Suzuki Burgman 400 K7; the first in Queensland actually; both, Queensland Transport and the insurer had to update their databases, before being able to register the vehicle.

On July 26th 2006 the engine of my Honda Foresight 250 died on me. Repairing it proved too costly. Loving to drive two wheels, I figured it was about time for a replacement.

Update: (February, 27th 2009) After totalling my much loved Burgman 400, I tried to replace it with a new Burgman 400. Unfortunately there were no Burgman 400s and I had to "involuntarily" ugrade to a Burgman 650 Executive.

Preface

There are all sorts of types of motorcycles to choose from. I am not prescribing a scooter as the be all and end all… the choice is a matter of taste and personal preferences.
My requirements though are: I need a practical, day-to-day, cheap-to-run, weather-protecting and (legally) fun-to-ride two wheels. For me, a scooter seems to incorporate all these attributes very proficiently. Considering the (generally) 100-km-speed-limit in Australia, as well as the distance I travel daily (20 km one way), and the mix of roads (suburbia, freeway, city), combined with best engine performance at 3/4-throttle, I always felt that a scooter with a top speed of some 130 km/h, and some 25 kW is the right thing for me to ride.

Information

Information, more so detailed information, seems hard to come by; at least here in Australia. Yes, the Icon: External link Suzuki Burgman 400 website lists most information, though in a rather unlovingly fashion. It lacks performance details, and has only one photo of the scooter (when I compiled this page originally in Aug 2006).

I have therefore put my own technical specifications page together, providing you with much more detailed information (compared to Suzuki or any other sources) about the scooter's specifications.

Making a Decision

My main criterion was, whether my notebook bag would fit under the saddle. Why a notebook bag? It is my mobile office, and has to be transported without being squashed. The Burgman 400 has 61 litre of boot space; Phenomenal!

There was more to it. As a lifetime fan of Honda motorcycles and scooters — since April 2006 even owning a Honda Jazz  — it was disappointing that Honda had no Maxi-Scooters in Australia at the time.
My second choice: Yamaha; they have the Majesty 400 and the T-Max 500, but none of the Brisbane dealers had one in store to have a look at it. Well, nothing else left so it seemed, until I googled for "scooter"… and up came Suzuki. Feel free to read the full story.

Breaking in

What a feeling! Driving the Suzuki Burgman 400 off the shop yard was a bag of mixed feelings: excited about the new bike, but also driving like on eggs, because of the new tyres, and certainly because of the new feeling of the handling of the bike, which is more motorcycle-like.

A new bike needs to be run-in, handled differently, compared to normal riding mode; the process is called "break in".
Read the manual! It outlines the mode of riding during the first few hundred and couple of thousand kilometres. Try to obey these rules for you own good, own safety, and longevity of you scooter. Tyres, brake pads, and more so the engine need a running-in period. It is worthwhile to pay attention; you will get the benefit of lower fuel consumption, and a well-performing scooter in the long run.

What a Ride!

I have listed the sales rap on my description page. I put it in there for completness, and hardly read this stuff myself (hence, why I basically overlooked that the Burgman 400 has fuel-injection; it was listed under the sales blurb, rather the Tech specs section), but…

… after deliberately overlooking the sales blurb in the first instance, I have now read it. And it is only now — I have to admit — that the sales rap actually describes reality; yes, there are still surprises in life :) … the Burgman 400 is a smooth ride!

In short: It is a smooth, comfortable ride with ample performance, strong acceleration, crisp throttle response, and sticking stable — like on tracks — on the road.

The default suspension setting of "3" was too hard for my weight of 75 kg, and was adjusted to "1". This change made the difference. I exclusively ride alone, meaning without a pillion passenger, and therefore also decreased the rear tyre pressure from 250 kPa (36 psi in old money) to 200 kPa (29 psi).

What I like about the Burgman 400

Fuel Consumption

Burgman 400 Odo-Trip-Meter

Suzuki Burgman 400, here my Odo-Trip-Meter

What struck me most was the fuel-consumption. My previous Foresight 250 constantly chewed up 4 l/100 km on average, ranging from 3.8 to 4.2 l/100 km over the seven years and 48,000 km I rode it. Considering the 400 ccm of the Burgman, I estimated it would need five plus litre per 100 km.
When I hit 3.3 l/100 km on the third day, I simply did not believe it! "The sensor must be wrong" was my first thought. The average consumption was 3.8 l/100 km over the first 1,000 km.
So how could this be? Given the sparse information, and my ignorance, I did not realise — despite having read the manual from front to back that the Burgman 400 has fuel injection. Now the consumption of 3.3 l/100 km made sense. Though surprising at first, it turned out to be a real (and pleasant) experience.

  • Aug 26th, 2006: I now have a value for a mix of city and suburbia riding only (not country/sticks): 4.2 l/100 km.
  • Sep 23rd, 2006: The 3.3 l/100 km are repeatable as I have experienced today. I filled her up, rode across town, out in the sticks, even gravel roads, all up 111 km in two hours, and 30 km at 110 km on the highway.
May 15th, 2007: Petrol Consumption of my Suzuki Burgman 400 over a 4,000 km sample ~ 4.12 l/100 km
Distance l/100 km litres
277 4.41 12.21
304 4.28 13.01
317 4.32 13.71
301 4.00 12.05
274 4.19 11.48
272 4.16 11.31
289 4.19 12.12
299 4.16 12.45
288 4.00 11.52
309 4.10 12.67
292 3.91 11.41
262 4.08 10.69
260 3.71 9.65
280 4.24 11.86
301 4.02 12.11

Dashboard

Burgman 400 Dashboard

Suzuki Burgman 400 Dashboard

Compared to what I had before, the Burgman 400 has it all: not one, but two trip meters (not sure yet what I will do with the second one), temperature gauge, a prominent placed fuel consumption display, the obligatory odometer and speedometer… yes, indicator lights, oil change indicator, hand break on light, fuel-injection fault light, high beam on light, and the security system light.

May 7th, 2007: Now I know how what to use the second trip meter for. I did a trip to the inland north-west of Brisbane (Crows Nest, Nanango, Kilkivan). I used the first trip meter as usual: between petrol stops. I used the second trip meter as a total trip meter. Sorry, sometimes it takes a bit longer to find enlightenment Happy Smiley

What I did not like

Is there such a thing? Well, for completeness the section should exist :) but there is one thing that could be better: the windscreen does not do a good job regarding wind protection when riding faster then 110 km/h; wind noise increases too. This is something the K7 shares with the previous model(s), based on what I read on European and US (forum) websites. Since we have a general speed limit of 100 km/h here in Australia, it shouldn't matter too much ;-)

Do I like the Burgman 400?

After what I said earlier, and how I arrived at this particular scooter, one would have certainly doubts, if not mixed feelings.
After 1,000 km in four days (Saturday had me going for 600 km) I can truly say: Yes, I most certainly like the Burgman 400!

When I drove off the yard at Brisbane Motorcycles, I drove like on eggs, a bit wobbly, new tyres you know, feels like having no friction. It felt different regarding weight, compared to my previous scooter. The first 50 km took some getting used to. On Friday I had no time to take the Burgman 400 for a spin :( … but on Saturday, hey this was great! Up and down the mountains, facilitating a nice break-in, constantly changing speed and load on the bike, just like the manual says :). After that ride I felt 80% comfy as far as the handling goes. The next 400 km made it 90%. I would say give it another 1,000 km and I have this thing checked out.

So far I have nothing to complain whatsoever; no rattling or other strange noises; all good! I booked it in for its first 1,000 km service on Tuesday (Aug 22nd, 2006), and since I am not allowed to have more than 1,200 km on the clock at the first service, the weekend is off for a ride-out; what a bummer!

Update; April 15th, 2007: I have now 8,200 km on it, and I am still very happy.

Well, it turned out to be a very nice scooter indeed.

Read about experiences with service and general matters on my Burgman 400 log file.

Read about my Burgman 400 riding experience on this continously updated page.

Visitor's Comments

Entries are shown in the order of latest first.

Author
Date / Time
Comment
Kelly from Colorado Springs, CO wrote on
Sunday, June 13, 2010 14:16
Found this site by accident :)
I own a 2006 Burgman 400. When I got my motorcycle license in 2005, Burgman's were nowhere to be found. When I finally found one in Rock Falls, Illinois in 2006, I immediately traded in my Honda Shadow 750 for the AN400.
My issue was storage. I needed a place to pack my lunch, office clothes and heels upon arriving at the office. Both my daughters were home all last summer and were using both cars. The Burgman was my only mode of transportation. So glad I had it! I've got 18,000 miles on it and still enjoy riding it everywhere! Earlier this year, I packed up and moved from Illinois to Colorado and every chance I get, I hop on and ride through the mountains and valleys. It has no problem keeping up with traffic on I-25 at speeds of 75 mph or better. I experienced a few problems with power trying to pass vehicles going up the mountainside, but I figured I wouldn't be needing to do that all the time. The one thing I wish Suzuki would have considered is equipping the Burgman's with a reverse gear for the times I need to back it up. I am only 5'6″ and weigh 125 lbs. and reverse would have been real nice at times. Those are my only 2 complaints.
Otherwise, I love my Burgman!
MaxG from Brisbane wrote on
Thursday, September 17, 2009 07:31
Hi Todd, I am sorry for the late reply. I am not sure in which age bracket you fit in; the 650 is harder to push around, yet it is a solid, low centre of gravity ride, hence, a very comfy ride. Both the 400 and 650 will do well at 110km/h speeds. Both have a similar storage capacity; and if you do not need the electric mirrors and windscreen, or the manual automatic, I believe the 400 will most certainly do the trick.
todd from onoway alberta canada wrote on
Monday, August 03, 2009 02:27
I read your report and I'm very impressed. I'm looking for one of these scooters for my wife. I looked at the 650 Executive, but it looks like a lot of toys on it that she won't use. So for a bit less the 400 might just fit the bill. I live outside of the city, so it would be highway runs all the time 110km/h. I have a Harley, so I need something for her to keep up with me and this sounds just fine…
MaxG from Brisbane wrote on
Thursday, June 04, 2009 19:09
Sounds like a sales spiel to me :) but I agree with contents.
gobay from Jakarta wrote on
Monday, June 01, 2009 14:15
Burgman's effective operating range is somewhere in the 290-km area. With a full tank an adventurous rider could spend a relaxing afternoon exploring the backroads in comfort and manage to pack along a rather bounteous picnic in the underseat storage. Boasting a solid all-around package that forces its rider to remind themselves it is a scooter, the 2007 Burgman 400 should continue to stay at the top of the luxo-scooter sales numbers.
John Allan from Strathpine near Brisbane Qld Australia wrote on
Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:39
Dear Sir,

Fantastic few words regarding the Suzuki Burgman. Do you stil regard it as the best?

I like it, but I also like the Honda Silver Wing 600. For one it is a twin; I have never liked single cylinder motorcycles. Awaiting your reply.

Yours Faithfully, John
MaxG from Brisbane wrote on
Sunday, April 05, 2009 10:28
Hi John, I still like the Burgman 400 and would have bought it after the accident, but there wasn't any in the country. The Burgman 650 Executive was the next best thing… and I bought it instead :)
Cheers, Max
MaxG from Brisbane wrote on
Sunday, December 07, 2008 14:49
Thank you for your kind words… and the link for the laminar lip. I will think about it.
Have you got your Burgi yet? I am sure you will enjoy it! I had many two wheels, and at this point in my life this thing is just marvelous :)
John Krause from Houston, Texas wrote on
Sunday, November 23, 2008 09:30
Max, enjoyed reading your web page describing breaking in new Suzuki Burgman 400. I am getting one, too. Live in
Houston, TX. Buying mine for same reasons you did.
Per comment on the air flow from the windshield. There is an inexpensive way to improve the situation (84 USD + shipping). Look at this web site for the Laminar Lip. http://www.laminarlip.com/ The Laminar Lip is an easy add-on to send windshield air high overhead.
Enjoyed your blog. John Krause
Glenn Warden from Sydney wrote on
Monday, April 21, 2008 19:36
Max, I thoroughly enjoyed the review on the 400cc. I too have a Suzuki Burgman although the 650cc model and found your surprise at the fuel consumption of the Burgman interesting.
I regularly get 4.5 litres per 100 km from my 650cc when I use it on freeways or country roads and I also own the new Piaggio 250cc MP3 scooter, which continues to amaze me with its handling although the Burgman is definitely up there too.
The Piaggio uses around 3.8 litres per 100 kms. I have my Burgman for sale but am having second thoughts, because every time I ride the Burgman I think what the hell am I doing selling it. I wish they had motorcycles like these when i was young. Ride safe!
MaxG from Brisbane wrote on
Saturday, March 22, 2008 14:08
I reckon the Givi screen is worth its money :) In particular for the pillion passenger.

I am afraid to say the plastic will have to come off, when you service the Burgman. I may service it myself once the 2-year warranty period is over in August. I had a bit too much of a trouble with the mechanics (as you may have read).

All the best with your new two wheels!!
Gary Hoath from Australia wrote on
Thursday, March 13, 2008 01:12
I enjoyed your appraisal of the scooter. I bought mine last week. I am 55 and had lots of bikes when I was in my 20s. It came with a larger Givi screen and I also have done 1000 kms in under a week. A honeymoon period. I have ordered a service manual, but dread taking all that plastic off. Hopefully I won't have to!
MaxG from Brisbane wrote on
Friday, November 09, 2007 21:11
Well, I hope my response is not to late for your decision-making :(

Yes, I think the Burgman 400 is adequately powered to tour around, with either luggage or a pillion.
Top speed is 150 km/h. Cruising at […] is not posing a problem.
You may have a look at the 700 km day trip I made in QLD: effortless and speedy.
[…]

Petrol Consumption: I have written elsewhere that I have a mix of 8 km on freeway, and some 5 km in the city, and 3 km in suburbia on my daily trip to work — same back = ~18 km per trip, ~40 km per day.
The Foresight does the trick for this scenario, but going slightly uphill means full throttle to weave nicely through traffic before reaching the next exit.
With the Burgi… no problems. There is enough oomph in it…

Hmm, your questions…

If you cruise within the max. speed limit, the fuel consumption should be under 4 l per 100 km. I would put it at 3.5 l max. So the 300 km should be fine.

The Kilkivan trip clogged the air filter prematurely, which explains the above average fuel consumption. This trip also answers your hot weather query… I had air temperatures close to 41 °C that day, water temp, despite sometimes excessive "load" absolute stable!

Yes, I am still happy with my Burgman 400 and would buy it again!

I don't blame the brand if the service mob stuffs up a service… good mechanics are hard to find, even harder one I trust.

And yes, the Honda 600 chews up more… and will cost you more. For me fuel efficiency is very important.
The Oomph the 600 ccm produces is mind-boggling and I was always tempted to let the thing do its magic, accelerating was sheer fun, but required a lot of self-control to stick with the speed limits.

But… and this is the reason I stick with adequate power, the 100 km speed limit basically negates any faster bike (at least for me; what is the point).

Another thing: when you do trips the storage of the Burgman is just awesome!

I assume you read the log book and other related Burgi pages on my site?!
I also wrote a test report on the SilverWing 600 and a comparison of both (Honda 600 and Burgi 400), also on my site.

[…]

The Burgi 400 is at present the best-selling maxi scooter in AU and in the world. Despite having a preference for Honda as a brand, the Burgi is a well-honed machine, which started out in 2001 in Europe where it is most successful.
Terry O'Neill from Geraldton, Western Australia wrote on
Wednesday, October 31, 2007 08:34
Hello Max, My name is Terry, I am 68 and live near Geraldton in Western Australia.

I got onto your site after googling Suzuki Burgman 400. Like you I've been riding a Honda Foresight and find it to be a good machine. I would however like something with a bit more power because I intend doing some long distance touring.

I had more or less made up my mind to buy a Honda Silverwing; till I read your write-up on the Burgman. It seems to me that the Suzuki is adequately powered for our 100 110 km/h limits; so there is not much point in going for more horsepower just for the sake of it. The Suzuki has it in spades over the Honda when it comes to fuel efficiency, Which really becomes important when, as is the case in WA, there can be something in excess of 300 km between service stations.

A couple of questions:
How does the Burgman handle long distances in hot weather?
Are you still happy with the bike?

Enjoyed reading your stuff... have fun... Terry
Jason from Brisbane wrote on
Saturday, September 23, 2006 19:45
Hi Max,
We love your web site!
Thanks Richie and Jason
Brisbane Motorcycles
Leave a Comment for this Page…

 

Copyright © 1996–2010 • Send an e-mail ... Max G • Last Updated: Monday, March 02, 2009  (117503)

All Rights Reserved • DisclaimerLogin

 

Google
 


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Summary list of external URLs referenced on this page: